Bitcoin: Why Is the Government Losing Confidence in It?


While bitcoin is reaching new heights and being supported by celebrities such as Elon Musk, India’s central bank appears to be sceptical about digital currencies.

There are a lot of apps and software like, which allow the traders to have a better knowledge of the cryptocurrency market.

The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) chief representative Shaktikanta Das stated that he had informed the Indian government of his concerns, which is expected to introduce a bill in parliament prohibiting private computerised monetary forms.

Why does the government have concerns about bitcoin? Let’s see:

The following are the various reasons for which the government is concerned for bitcoin:

  • Bitcoin is unstable:

Of course, there is a trace of legitimacy to the case that digital currencies are adversaries of national banks as they can’t handle them like sovereign cash. Be that as it may, the worries raised by the RBI lead representative aren’t unwarranted.

Bitcoin doesn’t get its worth from any resources or income. Subsequently, the worth relies absolutely upon what a financial backer will pay for it. Thus, its cost can be handily influenced. The cost of bitcoin spiked fundamentally on Feb. 8 after electric vehicle creator Tesla declared it had purchased bitcoins worth $1.5 billion.

  • Illegal tax avoidance and security concerns:

Another significant worry for India’s national bank is the obscurity that virtual monetary forms offer to their financial backers. This can make issues for monetary establishments to follow the progression of cash. What’s more, thus digital currencies could be utilized to move illicit cash or sidestep charges.

In this way, even as bitcoin keeps on beating other resource classes and enjoys certain benefits, the worries around digital currencies are difficult to overlook, particularly for a controller.

So one must wonder whether the concerns about bitcoin are valid or not? Let’s see:

The answer is yes. The following are some of the reasons which show that the concerns of the government about bitcoin are valid.

  • Why Does Government Power Matter?

Governments have control over fiat monetary standards. They use national banks to create or destroy money out of thin air, employing a financial strategy to achieve a monetary effect. They also control how fiat monetary forms are transferred, who benefits from it, how taxes are collected, and how criminality is tracked. When non-government entities create their monetary forms, they lose all control.

  • Monetary Policy:

While the possibility for wrongdoing draws the public’s attention, the role that money plays in a country’s monetary strategy may have a far more significant impact. Produce occupations are a huge problem since governments intentionally increase or limit the amount of currency circulating in an economy to stimulate enterprise and expenditure.

  • Bitcoin’s Business:

Bitcoin users don’t have to worry about the present financial system. Money is generated on the internet when so-called “diggers” use their computers to do complicated computations that serve as checks for bitcoin trades.

Carriers also reward miles’ effort on a smaller scale, allowing travellers to use their miles as virtual money to purchase boarding passes, hotels, and other items.

If bitcoin or similar digital money becomes widely accepted, the entire financial structure may become irrelevant. While this may appear to be a fantastic concept in light of the current financial business practices, there are several sides to each tale. When your house loan payment is hacked, who will you turn to if you don’t have a bank? What are your options for earning income on your investment funds? Who will step in to aid if a resource exchange falls through or a specific issue arises?


Besides the feature snatching reality that virtual monetary standards can and are utilized to take part in a wide scope of illegal movement (it ought to be noticed that money is utilized for a large number of these equivalent exchanges), there is an authentic hypothetical contention for their utilization. It depends on the truth that national banks fiddling with the cash supply has prompted downturns, exacerbated joblessness, and led to a worldwide financial framework dependent on exploitation and debasement.

You might also like

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top